Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
Judge the person, not the resume
|
|
Posted by:
Michael Medved at
5:38 PM
|
(Appeared in USA Today, November 3, 2009)
‘A nation that proudly offers fresh starts and open doors regardless of old world titles or family connections should reject snobbery based on either academic attainment or aristocratic ancestry.’ The poisonous polarization of the culture has produced some ill-considered attacks that call into question one of the most fundamental American values: the notion that each individual deserves to be judged on ability, not background, and evaluated on performance rather than credentials. For instance, some of the pre-emptive dismissal of Sarah Palin's upcoming book Going Rogue — with its massive first printing of 1.5 million — represents an elitist attempt to disarm a political combatant by questioning her qualifications. Echoing themes from the 2008 campaign, the former governor's many detractors focus contemptuous attention on her teenage participation in beauty pageants, youthful ambitions as a sportscaster and checkered academic career (transferring among four colleges before finally finishing a journalism degree at the University of Idaho). Some of the nation's most influential commentators face similarly sneering criticism based on educational background. I recently received an angry letter from a Texas teacher who despised all of conservative talk radio. "You're a pathetic joke, just like all the other professional blowhards who pollute the airwaves with their rants," he cheerfully opined. "Look at the biggest clowns in your business Limbaugh, Hannity, Glenn Beck. How many college degrees among all of them? The answer is zero. You're just a bunch of ignorant boobs who think that if you shout loud enough no one will notice you have nothing to say." It's true that my colleagues Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck all failed to earn university degrees, but they've won huge audiences based on undeniable skill as persuasive communicators. For those who are entertained, provoked or inspired by an opinionated figure on radio or TV, academic distinction is entirely irrelevant. Cronkite, Novak, Safire The public recently mourned the loss of three universally respected journalists — Walter Cronkite, Robert Novak and William Safire. No one questioned their brilliance, or their contributions to the culture, despite the fact that they all dropped out of college short of graduation. By the same token, sophisticated computer geeks may feel disdainful of Microsoft products, but they don't boycott that company because Bill Gates left Harvard without earning a degree. Cronkite, Novak and Safire rose to fame in an earlier era, when far fewer Americans graduated from college. In 1960, only 8% of adults 25 or older had earned university degrees. Today, the percentage of college graduates is nearing a third of all adults. In the election of 1948, the voters paid scant attention to the fact that President Truman never attended college. But today, with college education far more common and accessible, no politician could run a credible presidential campaign without some post-high school diploma. Ironically, the emphasis on intellectual elitism has become far more pronounced on the left than the right, despite the long-standing association of Democrats as "the party of the people." In 2008, college graduates voted decisively for Obama, and he won even bigger majorities of those with post-graduate degrees — not surprising for a candidate with credentials from Columbia and Harvard. Not only do studies indicate a considerable liberal tilt in college faculties, but Democrats support increased government spending for institutions of higher learning. Because progressives attach greater significance to universities, it makes sense that they judge the educational backgrounds of candidates (and commentators) accordingly: In the past six presidential elections, every one of the Democratic nominees held degrees from Harvard or Yale. This liberal infatuation with Ivy League affiliation, going back to the Harvard-trained Roosevelt and Kennedy families, also protects prominent progressives from doubts about their "unserious" early careers. Conservatives note that Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., spent most of adulthood as a comedian,or that New York Times columnist Frank Rich was a drama critic, or that MSNBC firebrand Keith Olbermann gained fame as a sportscaster. Liberals respond to such objections by insisting that whatever previous professional paths, their stars boast solid academic qualifications: Franken and Rich graduated from Harvard, and Olbermann got a degree from Cornell. Illogical attacks In that context, I've received personal attacks because of the 12 years I spent as a full-time film critic (reviewing movies for PBS and the New York Post) before launching my daily political talk show 13 years ago. The same correspondent who objected to the prominence of Limbaugh and company because of their lack of university diplomas suggested that my books and radio commentary deserved no attention because "you're a dummy movie critic with no qualifications at all." As a matter of record, I graduated from Yale with honors and attended Yale Law School, before working as speechwriter and campaign aide for senatorial and congressional candidates, and writing an acclaimed history of the White House staff. Of course, these achievements will do nothing to help my latest book if it's inarticulate or unpersuasive, just as Sarah Palin's early life struggles should in no way discredit her best-seller if it's riveting and insightful. Attempts to disregard messages by attacking the background of the messenger count as not only illogical but also un-American. A nation that proudly offers fresh starts and open doors regardless of old world titles or family connections should reject snobbery based on either academic attainment or aristocratic ancestry. For Palin, as for any candidate or commentator, the public will appropriately judge performance, not personal history, and should by all means read the book, not the r?sum?. Michael Medved, a member of USA TODAY's board of contributors, hosts a daily radio talk show and is the author of 12 books, including The Shadow Presidents and the forthcoming The 5 Big Lies About American Business.
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
Bumbling "Put Up" Time
|
|
Posted by:
Carol Platt Liebau at
5:02 PM
|
In the wake of Tuesday's elections, it's never been more clear that "put up or shut up" time is rapidly approaching for the President. The Right, of course, is opposed to him. And now, even some of the Left is getting sick of his all-celebrity, no-leadership model of governing.
It seems to me that if the President were half as smart as we've been told he is, he'd realize that he needs to step up. And if he were half as unflappable as we've been told he is, he wouldn't be doing stuff like this in the wake of the election: That's right, he's complaining again about the "mess" he inheirited from the Bush administration.
So you've got a delusional Speaker of the House, trying harder than ever to ram through a massively unpopular monstrosity of a health care bill, even though disgruntled voters list health care low on their list of concerns. You've got an electorally embattled Senate majority leader delaying bringing any bill to the Senate floor.
So there would seem to be plenty for the President to do, besides whine about the troubles he inheirited. More than ever, he should be projecting calmness, capability and the ability to engage in meaningful action. Instead, more than ever, he's contributing to the sense that he's not quite up to the job that he won with so little experience.
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
Why Would the AARP Endorse ObamaCare Cuts in Medicare? Follow the Money.
|
|
Posted by:
Meredith Jessup at
3:58 PM
|
The Chicago Tribune is wondering--what's up with the AARP? Something must be up:
Why else would the nation's largest lobbying organization, sworn to protect the interests of senior citizens, watch silently as Congress plans to cut Medicare spending by $400 billion to pay for its health reform legislation? Could it be that the interests of seniors and AARP are not exactly aligned?
Let's follow the money. AARP takes in more than half of its $1.1 billion budget in royalty fees from health insurers and other vendors that market services with the organization's name. Medicare supplementary policies, called "Medigap" plans, make up the biggest share of this royalty revenue.
AARP has an interest in selling more, not fewer, Medigap plans, of course. But there is a competitor on the block. A growing number of seniors are enrolling in a new form of Medicare coverage Medicare Advantage where they don't need Medigap. Medicare Advantage was created in 2003 to give seniors the option of joining private plans that are paid up to 12 percent more to provide better health benefits than traditional Medicare.
These private plans compete with each other by offering seniors such services as lower premiums, better drug coverage, dental care and eyeglasses, and more comprehensive coverage for major medical expenses. Nearly 11 million of Medicare's 45-million beneficiaries are in the program.
Congress' health reform bills would cut spending for Medicare Advantage by at least $150 billion. President Obama has singled out Medicare Advantage, saying it is a give-away to private insurance companies. But virtually all of the extra money goes back to seniors in the form of better benefits, so it's seniors who have the most to lose.
Read More...
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
Dems Press On With Radical Agenda, Despite Voters' Objections
|
|
Posted by:
Meredith Jessup at
3:53 PM
|
As hundreds (maybe thousands) of protestors gathered at the Capitol today to protest government-run health care options being floated around Congress, Democrats pressed onward in pursuing their agenda:
Reuters is reporting that a Senate committee led by Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) approved a "climate change" measure over the objections of Republicans. In fact, the GOP Senators boycotted the vote en masse in protest. The measure in question would "require U.S. industry to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases 20 percent by 2020, from 2005 levels."
"I think this is a great signal for Copenhagen that there's a will to do what it takes to advance this issue," committee Chairman Barbara Boxer told reporters after her panel voted.
Bloomberg is reporting that despite a perceived repudiation from voters in Tuesday's elections, the House Democratic leadership is proceeding with plans to vote as early as tomorrow on the massive $1 trillion government health care takeover. To ensure support, President Obama himself plans to visit Capitol Hill tomorrow. Forget the Dems having lost major elections on Tuesday. Pelosi rejects the idea that the party has lost momentum: “From my perspective, we won,” she said.
And if all this weren't enough, the Associated Press is reporting that Democrat Senators voted today to BLOCK a proposal submitted by Louisiana Senator David Vitter to include a simple question in the upcoming 2010 U.S. Census. The question? "Are you a U.S. citizen?" (Apparently Dems don't think we should ask...)
That's funny. I thought the purpose of the Census was to figure out how many citizens we have living here. It's also used to proportion congressional districts according to population. Hm... I wonder who would benefit from the Census counting a disproportionate number of illegal aliens undocumented citizens...?
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
12 Conservative Protesters Arrested At House Call
|
|
Posted by:
Jillian Bandes at
3:50 PM
|
Ten people have been arrested outside of Pelosi's office in the Cannon House Office Building. Four were charged with unlawful entry, and six for unlawful conduct in hallway. In addition, two other women arrested and charged with disorderly conduct.
This is in addition to another protester being pushed inside a Congressional office, as I reported earlier.....
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
Democratic Congressmen's Senior Aid Pushes "House Call" Protester
|
|
Posted by:
Jillian Bandes at
3:21 PM
|
Rep. Gerry Connolly's Communications Director George Burke reportedly pushed Teri Christoph, executive director of the group "Smart Girl Politics," after she visited Connolly's office as part of today's "House Call" protest.
Christoph had asked Burke why it was necessary for her to put her flip camera away -- an answer Burke had given her after she asked repeated questions about Connolly's stance on Pelosi's health care bill. No one has forgotten just how evasive the Congressman has been on the issue, but now it seems that he's resorted to siccing senior staffers on his own constituents to continue to avoid accountability.
Burke allegedly pushed Christoph's arm down forcefully after she asked about her camera, and it drew gasps of surprise from both junior Connolly staffers and about half a dozen other visitors inside Connolly's office.
Christoph was told that she needed a press pass to have a camera.
"[Then] he bumped into my arm that was holding the camera and threatened to call the police," said Christoph. "His young staffers conducted themselves very very well, but his senior staffer made it seem like I was the enemy…"
Inquiries to Connolly's office about the altercation have not been returned.
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
UK Climate Expert Warns Against Copenhagen Treaty, Global Warming Sham
|
|
Posted by:
Meredith Jessup at
3:15 PM
|
President Obama and other world leaders are gearing up to meet in Copenhagen next month to discuss global policies to fight global warming climate change. However, British climate expert and former advisor to Margaret Thatcher Lord Christopher Monckton--the man who reportedly was denied an opportunity to provide congressional testimony contrary to Al Gore's--is giving the United States a stern warning about the implications a global climate treaty could have on the country.
Last month, Monckton spoke at a conference held at Bethel University in St. Paul, Minnesota. The conference previewed a newly released 22-minute documentary entitled Climate Chains, a contrary viewpoint to Gore's notorious Inconvenient Truth:
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
California should be CARB FREE!
|
|
Posted by:
Dwayne Horner at
1:37 PM
|
The California Air Resources Board or CARB, according to the Washington Times, is threatening to require all cars and light trucks sold in California after 2012 to feature metallic reflective window glazing (i.e. tints) to keep interiors cool and thus use less air condition.
No, I am NOT JOKING! There so many reasons why this is wrong on so many different levels, OTHER THAN just more Government intrustion into your lives, such as:
The problem is that the new windows would reflect radio waves, thus highly compromising the use of GPS units, garage-door openers, laptop computers, satellite radio systems, parolee ankle bracelets, wireless medical equipment and cell phones.The problem is that the new windows would reflect radio waves, thus highly compromising the use of GPS units, garage-door openers, laptop computers, satellite radio systems, parolee ankle bracelets, wireless medical equipment and cell phones.
The new windows would add about $250 to the cost of each vehicle. Cars with sunroofs, and perhaps convertibles, probably would not comply and thus could effectively be outlawed. Drivers trapped in their cars after accidents couldn't call 911.The new windows would add about $250 to the cost of each vehicle. Cars with sunroofs, and perhaps convertibles, probably would not comply and thus could effectively be outlawed. Drivers trapped in their cars after accidents couldn't call 911.
Liberals fail to see the broad picture and just think Government is the solution to all - affectively killing the free market. Hmm, perhaps the Obama Administration can call these "saved jobs" since there is no way to justify that to begin with.
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
Homosexual Hate Monger Plays Palin In Drag On MSNBC
|
|
Posted by:
Greg Hengler at
1:01 PM
|
Remember this clown? How could you forget his hate-filled misogynistic Carrie Prejean diatribe on MSNBC's "Countdown" with Keith Olbermann? I did not think it was possible, but this segment is more disturbing -- and I won't even try to describe why because I would have to watch it again. You'll have to watch it -- if you dare. And, yes, homosexual Musto some how manages to take a last-second shot at Prejean.
Reminder: This is an Obama-approved "news" network.
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
Who Needs A Bigger Tent, Anyway?
|
|
Posted by:
Jillian Bandes at
11:02 AM
|
Re: Divided Electorate..... Instead of a lack of Republicans showing up in 2008, what if we focused on Democrats not showing up on Tuesday? That's the point Rush made yesterday:
So I guess we could say here that there's a civil war brewing in the Democrat Party and they need to go more in the middle. The Democrat Party needs a bigger tent! The Democrat Party needs moderates! The Democrat Party needs to expand it's base! Everything that they are saying from a template about us on the Republican side we could turn right around and smack 'em with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Blog Postings:
|
|
Last updated 7 Minutes Ago
|
|
Last updated 7 Minutes 19 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 7 Minutes 42 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 8 Minutes 31 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 8 Minutes 43 Seconds Ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall
|
|
|
|
|
|
|