NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Friday, November 06, 2009
Mona Charen :: Townhall.com Columnist
Are You with Us or with Them?
by Mona Charen
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 

President Obama likes to preen himself on his supposed moral superiority to his predecessor. He announced the closing of Guantanamo in his first week on the job (though 10 months on, it remains open) to advertise the new administration's disdain for George Bush's war-fighting tactics. And at every opportunity since, he has stressed that his policies -- on taxes, on the Middle East, on health care, on "man-caused disasters," and on "climate change" -- reflect a more refined and elevated morality than has ever before held sway in Washington, DC.

Arguing with Idiots By Glenn Beck

So you have to wonder how the president slept last Wednesday night.

He has known that critics in the United States regarded his posture toward the Iranian regime as weak. But on Wednesday, he heard this critique from a different quarter -- one that will be more difficult to dismiss.

Every year, on Nov. 4, the anniversary of the day in 1979 when Iranian thugs took American diplomats hostage in Tehran, the government has organized a street demonstration outside the former American embassy. In the early days, the rallies may have engaged a certain number of spontaneous participants, but they have long since become utterly stage-managed government shows. The only people the regime could muster this year to chant "Death to America! Death to Israel!" were non-Iranian members of Hezbollah and students bused in from the provinces for the purpose.

But that wasn't the only demonstration in Tehran that day. Displaying awe-inspiring courage in light of the brutal tactics (including murder) the regime has used to quell opposition, tens of thousands of Iranians took to the streets again. Instead of "Death to America," they shouted "Death to the Dictator" referring to Ahmadinejad. And they trampled on photos of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khameini. Michael Ledeen, of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, reports that demonstrations also erupted in Shiraz, Isfahan, Kermanshah, Zahedan, Arak, Mazandaran, Tabriz, and Rasht. As before, the regime used paramilitary goons on motorcycles to beat, teargas, and bludgeon protestors. And again the regime disrupted cell phone service, text messaging, and the Internet to prevent demonstrators from coordinating their activities.

But this is what should awaken Obama's conscience: The protestors chanted something new this time. As they dodged the blows of the militia, they chorused: "Obama! Obama! Either you're with them or you're with us."

This exquisitely moral White House was unmoved. Incredibly, President Obama released a statement that very day commemorating (!) the 30-year anniversary of the kidnapping of America's diplomats, taking the opportunity once again to abase himself and us. "Thirty years ago today," the president recalled, "the American embassy was seized" -- he did not say by whom. But because some anonymous agent seized the embassy, it "set the United States and Iran on a path of sustained suspicion, mistrust, and confrontation" that Obama is determined to reverse. He wants to move beyond the past and seek "a relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran based upon mutual interests and mutual respect."

By ostentatiously using the term "Islamic Republic" Obama tips his hand. He could have expressed his hopes for good relations with the people of Iran. That would have left the door open to a new Iranian regime that might not be politically Islamic. Instead he has signaled his eagerness to placate and yes, appease, the current malevolent Iranian leaders. "We do not interfere in Iran's internal affairs" he assured them. Asked about the demonstrations flaring around Iran, the president's spokesman Robert Gibbs hoped that "the violence will not spread," which sounds like something you'd say about rioters. In Iran, the violence is coming exclusively from the government, which is firing upon unarmed demonstrators.

Though the Obama administration has tripled the deficit in just 10 months in office, it has found one program to cut -- the $3 million to support the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center. The tiny research organization, which kept records of the disappearances, murders, and other human rights abuses in Iran, was abruptly defunded last month, sending a clear message of contempt to the Iranians who are putting their lives on the line to resist this vicious regime.

A successful overthrow of the nearly nuclear mullahs in Iran would be the greatest boon to world peace and stability since the fall of the Berlin Wall. After this week's events, it can no longer be said that the Obama administration isn't doing enough to support the opposition. The people on Tehran's streets know the truth -- he's effectively supporting the regime.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mona Charen is a syndicated columnist, political analyst and author of Do-Gooders: How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Mona Charen's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Obama is obedient to ....
George Soros and I suppose others of the same nature. It isn't important to me what nature of the leash the Lord Obama wears as I am not in the business of undoing him.
The point is that Soros turned other Jews in to the Gestappo for his own advantage. The media interviews the creep because they are totally without moral value.
What does it take to understand that these people are actively working for an Evil Force? This is an extension of the culture wars greatly heightened.
Tell me something good these people are doing. Then tell me why it's good. Then tell me what's in it for you. Finally tell me what measure you would consider too extreme to achieve the end and what measures you consider eligible.
It makes me feel good is ineligible as it isn't a tangible in the rational sense unless it's supported with reasoning.

Mondo Bizarro Coincidences, I Think Not
Maj Malik Nidal Hasan & CIC B.H. Obama.

They are both equal opportunity, affirmative action professionals, whose educations were paid for by US taxpayers and and are functioning as trained operatives acting inside the US Government.

The have both received poor evaluation reports in the last year.

They both were being directed to do things they did not want to do by the people they work for.

Basically they could not have their way. They react in a similarly spiteful and petty way when they could not have what they want.

They are of Muslim descent.

They send troops into harms way but do not want to go there themselves.

Their greatest fear is being killed by a Muslim. The fear supports their belief that this is not what Allah has destined them for, so basically rather than do as directed by those they are sworn to defend, they do the most treasonous, most obviously ungodly thing that can be done.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Keep up-to-date with your local KCBQ community.
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.